認爲特定「食物」有助「健康追求」興「治癒疾病」的看法,在今日的東亞文化圈內,可說是一種既普遍又風行的醫療概念與欽食行爲。然而,這種今日名之爲「食療」的知行,卻並非當代的原創,它自有其古典的淵源可尋;換句括說,「食療」一事是可以提在座史的脈絡中來加以察考的,而本文即爲之作。 在以唐代名醫孫思邈所撰《千金•食治》爲觀察伊始的行文裡,本文指出,《千金•食治》一方面誠然是唐代以降「食療奉行者」們的行爲華繩,但另方面,相涉的體認,其寶也早存見於漢魏時人的言論,以及唐以前的若干醫學古典中。因此,考量現存史料的狀況,對於這些早期的食療認知,我們祇能說其是零散,卻不能將其在唐以前的存在視之爲矇眛。通過文本的比對,本文發現,孫思邈的「食療觀」確實是基礎於這些前人的知見;整篇《千金•食治》的內容,其就是孫思邈「乃博群經,刪裁繁重」後的成果。 「食療」概念與行爲在兩宋的傅衍內容,基本上是足以體現傳統醫學知識傅承方式的轉變,以及近世士人又化的部份特徵,而有這課題在唐代以降的「社會史」與「文化史」研究旨趣,亦正由此展露。就社會的層面而言,「食療」這種在唐代似爲「傅播範疇有限」的認知體系,在宋代卻開始被「士人」―這個當日新與的社會陛層所掌握,而北宋官方封於醫籍刊印事業的熱衷致力,則在其間扮演了媒介性的角色。這些士人是「尚醫」的一群,他們是醫學在宋代普及的主要對象,也是醫籍中「食療概念」的傅衍者。 作爲「醫療概念」的「食療知識」其爲宋代尚醫士人所掌握,或許屬於社會性的因素;然而,由此一掌握所使然的「行爲」,卻又別有文化上的特色。從《養老奉親書》的「爲長者壽」,到《士大夫食時五觀》所隱含的對同質群體的期許,再下至《山家清供》裡那群視「食療」爲「清高」的士人們。我們不難發現,「食療行爲」在宋代的這層文化意義,共實是與時俱深的。時間愈後,「食療行爲」的施用背景愈切近矜士人日常的欽食習慣。是則,「食療」確已成爲足以反映當日士人文化物質的行爲。
The notion of food being able to improve health and cure illness is a common treatment concept widely practiced throughout Asia. The modem notion of shih-liao (food treatments) has its origins in the past and thus can be investigated from a historical perspective and understood historically. This essay focuses on such a task. By looking at the T'ang dynasty doctor Sun Szu-miao and his Shih-chih chapter of Ch'ien-chin Yao-fang to understand the style of treatments common at that time. I argue that the Shih-chih chapter, while definitely being used as a foundational text in medical treatment during the T'ang period, its concepts did its fact exist earlier and can be seen during the Han and Wei periods and in pre-T'ang texts such as: Huang-ti Nei-ching, She-nung Pen-tsao Ching, and Ming-yi Pie-lu. Today the historical materials we have for these earlier knowledge systems pertaining to food treatments are scattered. Sun Szu-miao's ”food treatment concepts” can first be sees in earlier works and his Shih-chih chapter is the result of his editing previous works and choosing what he felt were the more important arguments. While many researched shih-liao before and after the T'ang, none surpassed Sun Szu-miao on the conceptual level. It is the social and cultural ramifications of shih-liao, however, which have yet to be determined and explored. Shih-liao concepts and practices constituted a change in traditional medical knowledge since the Tang period. This was particularly the case in terms of the Sung literati and the culture surrounding them. At this level of Sung society, shih-liao evolved from a special knowledge system during the tang into a system that became part of the common knowledge of Sung literati. In the Northern Sung, medical texts and records were something that came under the control of the government but which later became easier to access by other social groups such as the Sung literati. The literati became the advocators of food treatments during the Sung and came to regard concepts of shih-liao as part of other medical treatments and thus as an element of the wider social uremia. Control over these social practices therefore also had strong cultural characteristics. If we look at Ch'en Chits book Yang-lao Feng-ch'in Shu and the treatments it proposes to increase ones lifespan, or Huang Ting-chieng's Shih-tai-fu Shih-shih Wu-kuan embodying the literati group, and shih-liao practices in the Shan-chia Ch'ing-kung, we can already see the high cultured world of Lin Hung and Isis literati companions. At this level, shih-liao represented a strong cultural phenomenon within a social spectrum which, over time, became more popular and widespread as a practice. Shih-liao became an everyday part of literati practices and thus constituted an important component of literati culture.