教練領導行為量表之編製暨運動情境領導理論之驗證

The Development of Coach Leadership Inventory and the Verification of the Theory of Sport Situational Leadership

王俊明(Junn-Ming Wang)

《臺灣運動心理學報》 7期 (2005/11) Pp. 1-18

https://doi.org/10.6497/BSEPT.20051101_(7).0001

摘要

本研究主要目的是1．編製一份適合國內各級運動團隊使用的教練領導行為量表。2．驗證Chelladurai and Carron (l978)的運動情境領導理論－教練會隨著選手成熟的不同而採取低任務高關係、高任務高關係、高任務低關係及低任務低關係的領導行為。研究對象為小學、中學（含國中及高中職）、大學及社會組運動團隊的選手，其中大學與社會組選手不得重複，所得選手共有1110人。在進行量表的編製時，使用到的統計方法有皮爾遜積差相關、t考驗、探索性因素分析等方法。在進行運動情境領導理論的驗證時，則以任務（訓練與教學的行為）和關係（社會支持的行為）兩種行為以圖示法為之。所得結果：1．教練領導行為共包含教練與教學的行為、讚賞的行為、社會支持的行為、溝通的行為及管理的行為等五個因素，其Cronbach α值分別為0.84、081、0.79、0.82、078；五個因素累積解釋的變異量為55.41%，是一份具有信度及效度的量表。2．我國教練領導行為依社會組、大學組、中學組及小學組的順序呈現低關係低任務至高關係高任務的行為，和Chelladurai and Carron (1978)的運動情境理論不符合。

關鍵字

教練領導行為 ； 運動情境領導理論

並列摘要

The purposes of this study were: 1. to develop a suitable coach leadership inventory for the sport teams of each level to use; 2. to verify Chelladurai and Carron's sport situational leadership theory-coach will adopt low task/high relationship, high task/high relationship, high task/low relationship, and low task/low relationship leadership according to the athletes’ maturity level. The subjects were the athletes selected from elementary school teams, junior and senior high school teams, college teams, and social teams. The college athletes could not overlap with social athletes. The total subjects were 1110 athletes. The statistical methods used in the developing ”coach leadership inventory” were Pearson product moment correlation, t-test, exploratory factor analysis. In the verification of sport situational theory, task behavior (instruction and training behavior) and relationship behavior (social support behavior) were used to show the chart. The findings were as follows: 1. Coach leadership included instructional and training behavior, praising behavior, social support behavior, communicative behavior, and managing behavior, and their Cronbach' α were 0.84, 0.81, 0.79, 0.82, and 0.78. The total explained variance of this inventory was 55.41%. 2. The coach leadership of social teams, college teams, junior and senior high school teams, and elementary school teams showed low relationship/low task to high relationship/high task form in order. The results did not match Chelladurai and Carron's (1978) sport situational leadership theory.

並列關鍵字

coach leadership ； sport situational leadership theory

參考文獻

王俊明(1982)。國小級任教師之領導行爲對班級氣氛的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。

邱金松(1981)。運動教練的社會學－團隊士氣的培養與領導。國民體育刊。10(1)，27-32。

陳玉娟(1995)。臺灣地區游泳教練領導行爲與選手滿意度與成績表現關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。

陳其昌(1993)。排球教練領導行爲對團隊凝聚力的影響暨驗證運動情境領導理論之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。

莊艷惠(1997)。教練領導行爲對團隊凝聚力及內在動機的影響(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。